Welcome

  • Grayling Day Demo -Speakers for Justice

    Grayling Day Demo -Speakers for Justice

    The following speakers spoke up for Justice at The Grayling Day demo in Westminster on 07/03/14

    1 Paul Harris
    A former president of LCCSA, Paul opened the proceedings with a rousing address. He said the cuts would result in a two-tier system – one for those with money and one for those without.
    2 Alistair Webster QC
    20140313-233553.jpg
    A Lib Dem peer but speaking as a lawyer he reminded us of their Party Policy of supporting Legal aid, but commented adversely on their failure in government to speak out against Grayling’s cuts, concluding “The politicians may have failed Justice. We will not.”

    3 Laura Janes
    Laura, representing The Howard League for Penal Reform dealt with how Chris Grayling has removed most prison law work from criminal legal aid.
    4 Sir Ivan Lawrence QC
    Sir Ivan (criminal barrister for over 50 years, and was a Tory MP for over 20 years) said he was ashamed of this Government. “We will bring the Criminal justice system to a halt to save it- that’s why we are here
    5 Ian Lawrence (NAPO)
    Representing the Probation Service, also under attack by Grayling,

    6 Paddy Hill

    20140314-003739.jpg

    Paddy reminded us what is at stake. “There will be many more miscarriages of Justice like the Birmingham 6 if legal aid is cut to this level.” An article about Paddy’s speech, with a clip in which he brands the MOJ the “Ministry of Injustice” is here.

    20140314-004257.jpg

    7 Sir Anthony Hooper
    Retired Court of Appeal Judge, Sir Anthony reminded us  eloquently:-“For some 60 years everyone has had the right to equal access to Justice. This Government is destroying that right”
    8 Francis Neckles
    Francis was rightly acquitted at trial, preserving his good character, thanks to good representation by his Legal Aid lawyer. “Chris Grayling says he can’t afford to fund legal aid- Francis Neckles says we can’t afford NOT to
    9 Shami Chakrabarti

    20140314-005149.jpg
    Representing Liberty, Chakrabarti made a powerful speech linking Legal Aid with freedom.

    10 Dave Rowntree
    Dave is drummer with Blur and was also a solicitor with Kingsley Napley.
    He spoke about the Magna Carta, which was signed 800 years ago next year, and clause 40 – “To no one will we sell, to no one deny or delay right or justice.”
    11 Nigel Lithman QC
    Representing the CBA, he had been invited to speak to demonstrate the unity between bar and solicitors in fighting the cuts. Three weeks later, the CBA struck a “deal ” with the MoJ, favourable to the bar but not solicitors, having met the MoJ secretly and without solicitors representatives being consulted. Relations between the criminal bar and criminal solicitors reached an all-time low point following these actions, but have improved enormously under subsequent and present CBA leadership.
    12 Janis Sharp
    Janis is Mum to Gary McKinnon, and led a courageous (and ultimately successful) fight against his extradition. She knows the value of legal aid, and  can be seen in the YouTube film below (incorrectly subtitled as Janis McKinnon- apologies Janis)
    13 Bill Waddington
    Bill was a former and the current chair of the CLSA.
    14 Noela Claye
    Speaking with the support of the charity Women against Rape WAR, Noela brought a victims perspective, and showed that ultimately this demo was not just about fees or careers, it was also about victims, clients, and justice.
    Noela spoke on camera in the short film of the start of the demo (link below)

    Hanna Evans
    Hanna was a new tenant and rising star at 23 Essex St. Chambers. Read more (and hear her speech) at #Just4Justice demo here.
    15 Sadiq Khan
    A former lawyer in a legal aid practice,  Labour MP and shadow Lord Chancellor (as he then was) Khan said he opposed Grayling’s cuts. When asked  to give an unequivocal commitment to reverse them if in office however he declined. In the run-up to the election campaign, he  combined his portfolio responsibility with the role of Labour lead for attacking the Green Party (who had made a commitment  to restore legal aid funding) and left the justice portfolio in favour of visits to Brighton rallying the Labour troops in an unsuccessful attempt to unseat Green MP Caroline Lucas. After the election, he successfully campaigned for London Mayor.
    16 Matt Foot
    Matt, one of the founder members of the Justice alliance summed up the rally, before leading a march to the Ministry of Justice.

    NOTES

    Short summary of the event by film-maker Ed Stradling with speaker clips here on Youtube

    Another short film of the start of the demo here (Thanks to Matt Tiller)

    Excellent commentary and photos of “Grayling Day” here (courtesy of Legal Aid Watch)

    Photos of demo, all speakers, thanks to Luca Nieve, here

  • Late Night Levy Madness

    The streets of Islington are, according to Islington Labour, rife with violent drunks after the midnight hour, and thus they have rushed to be the first London Borough to raise a tax on licenced premises- well summarised in the Tribune here as the Islington “late night levy”
    The move will have little effect on high-profit clubs with promotional drinks offers, disgorging their drunken clientele in the early hours, but will hasten the closure of small community pubs according to CAMRA
    In classic Islington style, the money raised will be spent on more saturation CCTV coverage, and recruiting a private security force, who will patrol the streets with no powers of arrest, a rag-tag motley-crew of para-military red-coats.
    This hare-brained scheme was introduced by Islington Labour’s Councillor Paul Convery.

    There was always something of the Puritan about Cllr Convery.

    Unfortunately, Captain Convery’s New model Army is more of a “Dad’s Army”, with Paul as a cross between Private Frazer and the pompous Captain Mainwaring character, supported by his loyal sidekick Cllr Poole, and some loyal backbenchers resembling Cpl. Jones, running around wringing their hands and shouting “Don’t Panic! Don’t Panic!”

    20140302-200305.jpg

    The proposal to introduce a privatised security squad was buried in the policy paper (at para 5.3 ) and was not a “recommendation” , perhaps because the idea had nothing to recommend it, but more likely as under the Constitution it is possible only to amend recommendations, so therefore impossible to table an amendment to the goon squad proposal. 

    Predictably, Councillors supporting the levy ignored the failure of current licensing policy and policing, and naively assumed that the levy would somehow magic away the problems associated with late night drinking. Thus, they argued anyone against the lobby was somehow in favour of vomit, urine and yobbery. Each speaker was keen to outdo each other with apolacyptic visions of Hogarthian imagery, Cllr Poole offering to conduct guided tours of the hellish scenes in his ward. It’s only a matter of time before someone takes up that idea, and we see “drunk and disorderly” tours advertised in TimeOut or Rough Guide. It was this hellish imagery that gave rise to the headline “Islington rivers of vomit and urine” in the Islington Gazette.

    In 1979 Elvis Costello recorded Oliver’s Army.
    Now we have Convery’s Army:-
    Convery’s Army are on their way
    Convery’s Army are here to stay
    And we would rather see anything else than Islington run this way…

    Full music playlist for “Cap’n Convery’s Late Night Levy Army” here

    Letter in Islington Tribune here

  • Protecting Children Services in Islington

    UPDATE:-My amendments to the Budget were unsuccessful, and the cuts to Children Services have gone through, with Labour Councillors voting instead to keep their press officers, support officers, and allowances (with the Lib Dems abstaining)
    Coverage in islington Tribune here

    November 2015-shock rise in crime in Islington reported.

    Original Post from 27 February:-
    At Islington Council’s Budget Meeting tonight, the Council is potentially going to make a grave error with its proposed drastic cuts in children’s services.
    The Council has of course been unfairly hit by disproportionate and draconian funding cuts from central Government, and there are inevitably difficult decisions to make.
    However, targeting posts in Children’s Services is making the axe fall in the wrong place, and potentially putting vulnerable children at risk.
    In my amendment, I will argue that the cuts should fall instead on the bloated Communications budget (currently running at about £1million per year), and on Councillors own allowances.
    When Labour took control in Islington in 2010, they had pledged to “slash” expenditure on both communications spending and allowances. Now they can fulfil that pledge, and protect a front-line service.

    My budget amendment also provides additional funding for road safety, especially around schools, and preventing bike theft (which is prolific in Islington)
    Detail
    I’m trying to stop the Councils proposed slashing of jobs in children’s services. (See appendix B esp items 3,4 and 7) In nearly £4million of proposed cuts, there are six senior posts and a management post being deleted amongst staffing reduction.
    I will protect these posts by instead:
    -abolishing party political spin doctors
    -abolishing the Councils propaganda magazine “Islington Life”
    -reducing the Councils million pound Communications budget by about a third
    -reducing Councillor allowances by 10% (to follow the example of Council Leader Richard Watts)
    (I will follow Cllr Watts Leadership, and take a 10% reduction in allowances, whatever the outcome of the budget amendment)
    -abolishing “special allowances” for chairing planning meetings.

    My amendment also provides funding for an air quality strategy to tackle killer pollution levels.

    Finally, my amendment also provides some additional funding for the Advice Alliance- there help for vulnerable people needed more than ever with Coalition attacks on welfare and the needy.
    (Also topical, with today’s announcement by Grayling killing off Criminal Legal Aid)

  • Islington Employment Commission

    Islington Council set up an employment commission, to solve the unemployment crisis in the Borough by having a series of meetings.
    It sadly never reached the high profile those who dreamt it up felt it deserved, so I’ve made this playlist to help promote it.
    The terms of reference, appointees and timetable were carefully controlled by the Council Leadership. Nonetheless, the aim of reducing unemployment was a laudable one.
    The process has finished, and the report is here
    Good luck with that!

  • Legal Aid Protest- lawyers on strike!

    I was not representing anyone on January 6th this year.
    Together with fellow legal aid lawyers, we were withdrawing our services, in protest at the underfunding of the justice system and cuts to legal aid.

    What happened on 6th January?

    There was this protest against legal aid cuts in the morning outside Westminster Court organised by the Justice Alliance.
    This was a public demo, well attended despite the weather, to show support for legal aid and against Grayling’s proposed cuts.
    I was stewarding a “training session” for lawyers, at Islington Town Hall (from 1115) organised by the LCCSA
    It all started to feel a bit like a strike!
    The protest was billed as a strike in the Daily Mirror
    This had never happened before, and shows the MOJ is in a “right old mess” as  reported here in the Telegraph
    The guardian also reported on the action
    but was this just the usual stuff from ‘fat- cat” lawyers?
    The reality of life for the majority of legal aid lawyers is far, far removed from the distortions regularly reported in the popular media. What is dispiriting is that selective and misleading quotes and stats are routinely deployed by the MOJ to re-in force the stereotype.
    Check out the Legal Aid MythBuster here
    The point of the demo was to help make people aware that if this Government continues with these cuts, It will lead to the collapse of proper publicly funded defence, and innocent people will be either unrepresented or poorly represented, with bitter consequences for Justice and Society.
    A report on the Days events in Islington is here

    Catch up on twitter comments #fight4legalaid and/or #walkout4justice

    20140106-014858.jpg

    20140106-020615.jpg

  • Cycle deaths in London

    I attended a demo outside TFL HQ on Blackfriars Road, to highlight the sad cases of recent cycling fatalities in London, and the failure of Boris/TFL to take proper budgetary action to improve cycling safety.
    Thousands of cyclists laid down their bikes and lay in the road in a symbolic gesture described as a “die-in” by the organisers, an informal group who set up the Stop the Killing protest
    The concerns will not go away- and pressure is building on Boris to act.
    There is a lot of anti-cycling sentiment out there, for which some cyclist behaviour does not help, but ultimately cyclists are vulnerable and it is time to stop blaming cyclists for the fatal accidents or incidents where they are seriously injured, and work to make London a safer, more cyclist-friendly environment.
    A similar argument (but much better written) is made here by Caroline Russell of Living Streets
    cycling playlist here

    20131203-184542.jpg

    20131203-184605.jpg

    20131203-184619.jpg

  • A postcard to Mr Clegg

    In 2013, as requested by Save UK Justice campaign, I wrote a postcard to Nick Clegg, the then Deputy PM in the Coalition Government, and helped deliver a batch of over 3000 similar such postcards.

    Lib Dem policy as approved at  party Conference, supported Legal Aid.

    Dear Mr Clegg,

    You are the Leader of the Liberal Democrat Party, currently in Government in coalition with the Conservatives.

    That Party is committed to savage, damaging and unsustainable cuts.
    Your Party, to its credit and in stark contrast, has declared a Policy to support Legal Aid.
    What are you, as Leader, going to do about it?
    Yours sincerely,

    Greg Foxsmith”. (Together with 3000+ other postcards and the Save Justice UK Campaign)
    We finally received an answer from Clegg -published  by SaveJusticeUK here
    The  response was woefully inadequate, sloppy, fatuous and factually incorrect. It was worse than a brush-off-it was a calculated insult. There were still some good people in the Lib-Dems, but it was now clear they needed to examine their consciences, and either change their leader, or change their party. They did not manage the former, although many did the latter, and the Lib Dems were decimated in the post-Coalition election of 2015.

    Now, at the Lib Dem Conference (September 2016) the Lib Dems pass a motion “regretting” the legal Aid bonfire. (This regret is seemingly not shared by the ghastly Lord McNally, Lib-Dem minister and sidekick to Chris Grayling, who (along with Simon Hughes) should carry much  of the blame)

    Sadly for those who support legal aid (and more importantly those who need it) this expression of regret by the Party Conference  comes  too late. Nick Clegg cannot say they were not warned.

    20131203-001825.jpg

    20131203-001856.jpg

    legal aid playlist
    postcards-for-justice

    20131203-002457.jpg

    Notes
    1 I attended Lib Dem HQ in November, representing the LCCSA, to help deliver the thousands of save Legal Aid postcards as part of the postcard campaign organised by SaveJusticeUk.
    Also attending from Islington was Ruth Hayes, (pictured with me outside LD HQ in photo above) from Islington Law Centre.
    Ruth told me “the Law Centre knows the importance of Legal Aid to vulnerable clients, who without it will be denied justice. We are particularly concerned about the impact of the Residence Test, and changes to funding for Judicial Review.”
    2 see also opinion piece in Lib Dem Voice here.)
    There was also advice to act quickly from Lib Dem Lawyers -and we all know what happens to people who ignore legal advice….

  • War Child

    This month (December 2013) I ran the Santa Run (10k dressed as Santa) for the brilliant charity War Child
    A fantastic charity, and what better time to support their work helping the children who are victims of war than in the run up to Christmas, as we in the privileged West indulging in our annual orgy of consumption and consumerism would do well to remember.
    I may have completed the race, but it’s not too late to sponsor me!
    So be of good cheer, and don’t be a Scrooge- please sponsor me for this years Santa race to help the work of War Child.

    It’s a great fundraiser, and a really fun event in which to participate or take part. It’s a surreal site to see so many Santas sprinting off , all raising money for good causes. I completed last years race in Greenwich which I ran for Greenpeace) ,and I’m looking forward to Santa Dash 2015!
    Below are some photos from last years race, and this years event in Victoria Park.

    Playlist of music recorded for WarChild

    20131202-230539.jpg

    20131202-231521.jpg

    20131209-104709.jpg

    20131209-104728.jpg

    20131209-104742.jpg

    20131209-104754.jpg

  • The Death of Imran Douglas:- A Suicide in Custody is no Cause for Celebration

    In some parts of Morocco, after a funeral the family gather and share a meal of couscous, the legend being that each grain eaten atones for a sin during the life-time of the deceased. This week I joined a family for couscous (picture below) to mark the passing of 18 year old Imran Douglas who sadly killed himself in Belmarsh prison. Imran was British born, his maternal Grandmother from Morocco.
    You might think that an awful lot of couscous would need to be eaten to atone for the sins of young Imran, who had brutally murdered a pensioner in her own home.
    Imran, who had (unusually in a murder case) pleaded guilty for the crime committed when he was just 17, had been sentenced to a period longer than his age (a minimum term of 18 years), and sent to high security Belmarsh prison (until very recently he would have been detained in a Young Offenders Institution until he reached 21).
    Less than a week later he was dead, having apparently ended his own life.
    It will take years for an Inquest to establish if that is right, or whether there was foul play (or as previously seen at Belmarsh, excessive restraint)

    Few will shed tears or care about his demise, the memory of his horrific crime being fresh in the mind, having been vividly reported at the time, again at his sentence, and now once again on the news of his own death (the circumstances of which appearing to attract little curiosity).
    Indeed his passing appears to be celebrated by those who feel the need to express a view at all, commentary being summarised as “he got what he deserved, prison too good for him” etc.
    Yet watching the small gathering of family and friends who cared for or about Imran, one is reminded that he leaves behind his own family, including mother, sister, grandparents, and although they never condoned or tried to justify his terrible homicide they too have the same grief and feel the same loss as anyone bereaved.
    And perhaps our collective conscience should be pricked just sufficiently to remind ourselves that he was still a teenager,that he was in the institutionalised care of the State, and that by allowing him to hang himself he was failed by the State. As many have been before. (About 50 prisoners AGED 21 OR YOUNGER IN THE LAST SIX YEARS ALONE)
    There will be many more deaths by suicide of vulnerable young people held in adult prisons, if proposals currently being consulted on by Government are implemented, as the Howard League argue powerfully here

    At least Imran Douglas acknowledged his responsibility by pleading guilty to his crime. It is a safe bet that nobody will admit responsibility for his death, and very unlikely that anyone will be found responsible.
    And the fact that nobody (other than his grieving relatives) care, allows this culpable negligence to continue year after year, which should be a matter of shame. How we treat prisoners is a mark of our society, as Winston Churchill amongst others acknowledged. So even those who won’t shed tears at the passing of a convicted murderer should still ask:-
    Is it right that someone so young was serving his sentence in an adult prison?
    Was he assessed as a suicide risk, and if not why not?
    Alternatively, if an acknowledged risk, how was it apparently so easy for him to take his life?
    Will the Inquest uncover any facts or (as Imran’s family hope) help prevent further suicides of young people? (There are reportedly eight outstanding inquests into deaths in Belmarsh

    And in the unlikely event that anyone had the time or inclination to look at why this young man ended up committing his crime in the first place, they could start by looking at the incident in April 2012 ago where he was hit by a speeding car, and put into a coma on life-support with severe neurological damage. Although no angel before, this was a life-changing incident, and when he came through his demeanour and personality had changed beyond recognition.
    Whether he then received the after care from occupational health and/or medical authorities is not clear, and may be out of the remit of the inquest into his death.
    The car that hit him? That was a police vehicle. No charges brought in respect of that. But that incident isn’t something you will have read about in the media reports about his death, as it doesn’t sit comfortably with the simple “evil murderer” narrative that allows us to share a feeling of revulsion and moral superiority.
    His family, at the wake in their small East London flat, know there was more to Imran than just the one awful crime for which he will be infamously remembered. And they have never stopped thinking about the consequences of that hideous crime, or feeling compassion and sympathy for the family of Margery Gilbey, along with guilt that it was Imran who was responsible.
    Nothing in this article should be considered as trying to justify that crime, but it is important that we at least try and understand it. And we can and should as a society deplore that murder, but it is not necessary as a corollary of that to celebrate the death by self-harm of the murderer. A suicide of a young person should always be a cause for concern, not a cause for celebration.
    Nothing can now bring back the victim of Imran Douglas’ crime, but at least justice was done when Imran pleaded guilty and was sentenced.
    It is unlikely that there will be any justice for Imran’s family, who have lost their son and been treated with indifference or outright contempt. And to our shame, few will care.

    NOTES

    1 BELMARSH prison have confirmed that 18 year old Imran Douglas (detained at age 17) died in custody at the prison on 13 November 2013.
    2 The cause of death is said to be suicide, although an inquest will take place to confirm the cause.
    3 Police attended the prison and stated there were no suspicious circumstances.
    4 Imran’s mother Carla heard the news informally via a third party the following day, but could not get official conformation of her son’s death for over 48 hours. She was in shock and taken to hospital, the prison initially refused to confirm where the body was taken.
    5 Imran Douglas was buried following a service at East London mosque on 18 November. It was on the day of his funeral that the Daily Mail reported on his death and readers posted their gloating comments.
    6 Imran’s family will be asking for help from Inquest, the charity providing free advice to bereaved people facing an inquest, with a focus on deaths in custody. They work for truth, justice and accountability for families and for policy change at the highest level.
    7 This article/blog is written in a personal capacity, with the support of Imran’s mother Carla. 

    Imran’s mother said “I am heartbroken. It was hard enough coming to terms with the fact that he had committed a serious crime, and had such a long sentence, but now he has gone for ever. How is it that the prison service can let this happen? “

    20131121-003654.jpg

    20131121-125820.jpg

    One of the more moronic comments following the Mail article was one that claimed “you can tell from his photo he was born evil”.
    I disagree- in the charge photo, cloaked in a blue police custody blanket, he looks to me young and frightened.
    He was not born evil- and his family will remember the happy times shared together, although they cannot forget his crime, or stop thinking about how desperate, sad guilty and frightened he must have been when he took his own life.
    With permission of Carla, I include above a photo of Imran as they will try and remember him.
    I hope their questions are eventually answered.

  • Cycle theft in Islington.

    Cycle theft in Islington.

    playlist: “bike theft in Islington”-click here to listen

    Bike Theft in Islington
    About 1500 cycles were reported stolen in the London Borough of Islington in 2013 and about the same the year before. (One of them was mine.) The true figure is almost certainly higher, as many people in Islington no longer bother to report the loss of a push-bike.
    I was able to get confirmation of how many of the 3000 bikes stolen were recovered- the answer being about 5%.
    It is hard to imagine many crimes where the clear-up rate would be so low, or considered acceptable.

    The figures for the following years were equally dire.

    1,021 bicycles were reported stolen between 1/11/14 and 31/10/15. Of these, 36 were recovered and returned to their owner. The recovery rate has actually fallen -to about 3%

    A year later, and some Islington Cyclists had their bikes stolen and had to compete in charity race on hire Bikes (as reported in Standard 08/16)

    What is needed:-
    1 Recognising bike theft as a crime and allocating police resources to preventing, deterring and solving bike-theft
    ( on 27/02/14 – I proposed an amendment to Islington budget to provide additional funding for that instead of propaganda and Councillor allowances, but the amendment was defeated by Labour)
    2 Council provision and encouragement of more secure bike storage
    3 Better and  co-ordinated bike identification, so that every bike sold in LBI should be properly marked, identifiable and traceable at point of sale

    Notes

    Islington:- a Borough where it is not safe to leave a bike locked up in public
    However, cycle racks are pointless if cyclists have no confidence that their bike properly locked and secured will still be there on their return. Bike thieves in Islington now act with impunity, pushing cycle theft to epidemic proportions. Many stolen bikes are then used to commit ride-by robberies, making Islington the phone-snatch capital of London.
    The Labour Council point to their heavy investment in CCTV. It was interesting to watch a film of someone stealing my bike, but it didn’t prevent the theft, or get it returned.
    I’ve had three bikes and one set of wheels stolen in Islington in ten years, and no longer cycle in the Borough if there is not secure indoor storage at the other end of the journey. It’s simply not safe to do so.

    20131013-133514.jpg